Power: Do Powerful People Want Your Opinion, Care What
You Think, Use Sex, And Know What Happens When YOU
are Powerless?
by Kevin Hogan
Page 3
This research looks at an issue that has been largely ignored
by social scientists, Petty said. Many studies have looked at
how the power of a person delivering a message impacts those who
receive it. But this appears to be the first study that looks
at how the power of the message recipient affects persuasion.
In several related studies, the researchers told college
students they would be participating in two supposedly separate
experiments. In one experiment, the students role-played in a
situation in which one was a boss - in other words, had a
position of power - and the other was an employee who simply
took orders.
In the second experiment, the participants viewed a fake
advertisement for a mobile phone. The ad was designed to see if
participants were paying attention to the message, so half the
participants received ads with particularly weak arguments for
buying the phone (for example, touting that it had a broad
currency converter), while the others received strong arguments
(the phone could be recharged in just 5 minutes). Participants
were then asked to rate how favorably they viewed the phone.
When the role-playing exercise was conducted before viewing the
phone ad, those who played boss were more likely than those
playing employees to rate the phone similarly -- whether they
received the strong or the weak arguments.
"The strength of the argument made no difference to those who
played the boss - they obviously weren't paying attention when
they felt powerful," Petty said. "Those who played the
employee, who were made to feel powerless, paid a lot more
attention to the arguments. They weren't as confident in their
own initial beliefs and weighed the arguments more carefully."
In a related study, the order of the experiments was
essentially reversed. Participants first read the mobile phone
ads, and were presented with either the strong or the weak
arguments, and wrote down their thoughts while reading it.
However, before they actually rated the phones, the same
participants took part in the role-playing exercise in which
some were the boss and some the employee. Later, they went back
and rated the phones.
The results showed that the bosses in the role-playing exercise
were now more influenced by the quality of the arguments in the
ads. Those who were low-power employees were not as influenced
by the ad quality.
"When power was experienced after the ads had been processed,
it gave people confidence in their most recent thoughts, so if
they read strong arguments, they rated the phones more
favorably. If they read weak arguments, they were much more
negative toward the phone," Petty said.
"Those who were feeling less power weren't as confident about
the validity of their thoughts to the ads, so the strength of
the arguments didn't matter as much."
What this all means is that it matters when people are feeling
powerful - before or after they receive a persuasive message.
If the message comes right after their power is made relevant to
them, then powerful people will be difficult to persuade because
they are confident in their existing opinions.
However, if
people can be made to feel powerful right after a strong
persuasive message, attitude change is more likely because
powerful individuals will feel confident in the positive
thoughts they generate to the message, Petty said.
To read about how this applies to getting a raise, turn the page...