Influence: Are You a Defector (Freeloader), Punisher or Cooperator
by Kevin Hogan
Page 5
In societies where the modern ethic of co-operation with unrelated
strangers is less familiar and the rule of law is perceived to be
weak, revenge is more common and co-operation suffers, the study found.
Economists are keen to understand the decision-making processes
behind co-operation, as working together for the common good is
crucial for progress in any society -- not least for effectively
addressing big issues such as recycling and tackling climate change.
Professor Simon Gaechter and Dr. Benedikt Herrmann at The University
of Nottingham and Dr. Christian Thoni at the University of St. Gallen,
Switzerland, studied the behaviour of people in 16 cities around the
world, from Boston and Bonn to Riyadh, Minsk, Nottingham, Seoul and
others.
Volunteers played a 'public goods' game in which they were
given tokens and told they could either keep them all for themselves,
or put it into a common 'pot' that would yield extra interest that
would be shared out equally among all players.
If all volunteers pooled their money, then all would come out with
more at the end of the game. But if individuals chose to keep the
money for themselves -- and not contribute anything -- they could
keep all of it and also benefit from the generosity of others, by
sharing in the pooled interest.
Levels of co-operation were remarkably similar across all 16
nations. However, behaviour changed dramatically when everyone's
contributions were revealed -- and players were given the ability to
'punish' other players. Players could punish each other by taking
tokens away from each other, although this option cost the Punisher a
token as well. As previous studies have shown, players were willing
to part with a token of their own in order to punish Low Investors or
Freeloaders.
But the Science study also uncovered a new phenomenon. In subsequent
rounds of the game, the Freeloaders took revenge and hit back at
their Higher-Paying Counterparts in what is described as 'anti-social
punishment'. Or at least, they did in some cities -- most notably in
more traditional societies based on authoritarian and parochial
social institutions such as Muscat in Oman, Athens, Riyadh in Saudi
Arabia, Samara in Russia, Minsk in Belarus, Istanbul, Seoul and
Dnipropetrovsk in Ukraine. Players in these cities showed the highest
levels of 'anti-social punishment'.
The ultimate effect of this is to decrease co-operation between
individuals, bringing down contributions and earnings to very low
levels.
Continue the article to learn more about specific cities' results...